Zzap!64 70

Cite as: Zzap!64 70
Original: https://archive.org/details/zzap64-magazine-070
sha256: cfecdc5f0041ad732348f602872d2a141f7a1ce409463d8c7d49f36ce5f37cf1
Archived: https://archive.org/download/zzap64-magazine-070/ZZap_64_Issue_070_1991_Feb_djvu.xml
Accessed: 2026-11-06
Licence: © Newsfield (at the time of publication); scan hosted by the Internet Archive
Credit: Scan in the Internet Archive item "zzap64-magazine-070"; the pin is the item's OCR, as DjVu XML.
Notes: Pinned in archive batch 29 as a lead for Prince of Persia, Double Dragon, Gauntlet III, Narco Police, Cyberball and Vindicators, found through the Amiga Magazine Rack's index.

Cited on

Zzap!64 reviewed the Commodore 64 version, sold by Domark only on cartridge at £19.99, in February 1991, eight months after the 72% Amiga version, and gave it 78% overall, with 77% for sound, 79% for hookability, and 75% for lastability. Zzap!64 later told a reader that Domark had released Cyberball for the Commodore 64 on cartridge and that it never appeared in its own right on tape or disk.	`p. 18 (image 18), review headingp. 18 (image 18), second reviewer's commentp. 18 (image 18), ratings boxp. 18 (image 18), ratings boxp. 18 (image 18), ratings box`	Magazine
Zzap!64 reviewed the Commodore 64 version, sold by Domark at £19.99 on cartridge, in February 1991 and gave it 35% overall, with 65% for presentation, 60% for graphics, 30% for sound, 51% for hookability and 31% for lastability, summing it up as "Overpriced, lacking variety, depth and challenge." One reviewer found that it couldn't match the coin-op's glitz and had to rely on gameplay that "was never that addictive anyway".	`p. 18 (image 18), review headingp. 18 (image 18), ratings boxp. 18 (image 18), second reviewer's commentp. 18 (image 18), second reviewer's commentp. 18 (image 18), second reviewer's commentp. 18 (image 18), ratings boxp. 18 (image 18), ratings box`	Magazine